MENTAL STATES IN THE BRAIN: A CRITIQUE OF THE COGNITIVE SCIENCES

Authors

  • Cristinel UNGUREANU PhD Candidate, “Al.I. Cuza” University of Iasi (Romania) & University of Konstanz (Germany).

Keywords:

cognitive sciences, implementation conception, functionalization, syntax of Men-talese, real patterns, architecture of the brain.

Abstract

In this text we shall criticize a certain cognitive position about the relation between mental states and the brain. Our target is the claim, found in many cognitive theories, that mind is implemented in the brain, that is, that mind results from the brain’s processing of symbols. We argue from a philosophical position that the image of brain as a symbolic engine is false. The brain does not have to work with symbols in order to produce mind. The text is divided in three chapters: the first chapter sketches the sources of implementation thesis; the second chapter shows the problems met by such a thesis; the third chapter discusses the consequences of this critique for mental realism. As a first general remark, our critique of cognitive sciences is based on some well known ideas of John Searle. Especially, we have developed some ideas found in the chapters 9 and 10 of his The Rediscovery of the Mind, 1992.

References

Ned Block (1978), “Troubles with Functionalism” in Ned Block (ed.) 1980a.

idem (ed.) (1980a), Readings in Philosophy of Psychology, vol. 1, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1980.

idem (1980b), “Introduction: What Is Functionalism?” in Block 1980a.

Boghossian, Paul (1990), “The Status of Content”, The Philosophical Review, Vol. XCIX, No. 2, 1990, pp. 157-184.

Peter Carruthers, Jill Boucher (eds.) (1998), Language and Thought. Interdis-ciplinary Themes, Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Andy Clark (1998), “Magic Words: How Language Augments Human Compu-tation”, in Peter Carruthers, Jill Boucher (eds.), 1998.

Daniel Dennett (1987), Intentional Stance, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1987.

idem (1991), „Real Patterns”, in Brainchildren. Essays on designing minds, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1998.

Michael Devitt (1991), „Why Fodor Can’t Have It Both Ways”, in Barry Loewer, Georges Rey (eds.), 1991.

Jerry Fodor (1974), "Special Sciences", Paul K. Moser, J. D. Trout (eds.), Contemporary Materialism. A Reader, Routledge, London, New York, 1995

idem (1975), The Language of Thought, Harvester Press, Hassocks, Sussex, 1975.

idem (1987), Psychosemantics. The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1987.

idem (2008), LOT2: the Language of Thought Revisited, Clarendon Press, Ox-ford, 2008.

Jerry Fodor, Zenon Pylyshyn (1988), “Connectionism and Cognitive Architec-ture: A Critical Analysis”, in Cynthia Macdonald, Graham Macdonald (eds.), Connectionism: Debates on Psychological Explanation, vol. 2, Blackwell, Ox-ford, Cambridge, 1995.

Susan Goldin – Meadow, Ming yu Zheng (1998), “Thought before Language: the Expression of Motions Events Prior to Impact of a Conventional Language Model”, in Peter Carruthers, Jill Boucher (eds.), 1998.

Jaegwon Kim (1989), “The Myth of Nonreductive Materialism”, in Superven-ience and Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, new York, 1993.

David Lewis (1970), “How to Define Theoretical Terms”, Journal of Philosophy, 67 (1970), pp. 427-446.

idem, (1972), „Psychophysical and Theoretical Identifications“, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 50, No. 3, 1972, pp. 249-258.

Barry Loewer, Georges Rey (eds.), Meaning and Mind. Fodor and His Critics, Blackwell, Oxford, Cambridge, 1991.

David Marr (1982), Vision. A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information, W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 1982.

Ruth Garrett Millikan (1989), “In defense of Proper Functions”, in White Queen. Psychology and Other Essays for Alice, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, London, 1993.

Allen Newell (1982), “The Knowledge Level”, Artificial Intelligence, 18 (1982), pp. 87-127.

Andrew Pessin (1995), “Mentalese Syntax: Between a Rock and Two Hard Places”, Philosophical Studies, 78 (1995), pp. 33-53.

Hilary Putnam (1973), "Philosophy and our Mental Life", Mind, Language and Reality. Philosophical Papers Vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, London, 1975.

Zenon Pylyshyn (1984), Computation and Cognition. Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., London, 1984.

Georges Rey (1997), Contemporary Philosophy of Mind. A Contentiously Classical Approach, Blackwell, Cambridge, Mass., Oxford, 1997.

Lynne Rudder-Baker (1987), Saving Belief. A Critique of Physicalism, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1987.

John Searle (1980), “Minds, Brains, and Programs”. The Behavioural and Brain Sciences 3, 1980, pp. 417-424.

idem (1990), “Is the Brain’s Mind a Computer Program?”, Scientific American, 1990, pp. 26-37.

idem (1992), The Rediscovery of the Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., London, 1992.

idem (1995), The Construction of Social Reality, The Free Press, New York, 1995.

idem (1999), Mind, Language and Society. Doing Philosophy in the Real World, Weidenfeld & Nicholson, London, 1999.

Paul Smolensky (1991), “Connectionism, Constituency and the Language of Thought”, in Barry Loewer, Georges Rey (eds.), 1991.

Kim Sterelny (1990), The Representational Theory of Mind. An Introduction, Blackwell, Oxford, Cambridge Mass., 1990.

Published

2015-05-20