COMUNICAREA CA PROBLEMATIZARE. PRELIMINARII LA O TEORIE PROBLEMATOLOGICĂ A COMUNICĂRII

Paul BALAHUR

Abstract


The main thesis of this study is that without problematization there is no communication, because all the communicative acts have a meaning only in reference to a problem, only if the message is understood as an answer to a question. Therefore in order to understand communication we need a new conceptual framework based on a systematic reflection on the place and the functions of problems and problematization modes in the communicative processes. Theoretical resources for this reflection are found in the interrogative theory of understanding elaborated by R.G Collingwood as a „logic of question and answer” and developed in the hermeneutics of H.G. Gadamer and the problematology of M. Meyer.The study aims to identify some constructive principles, critical implications and practical applications of a problematological theory of communication.

Keywords


problematization; logic of question and answer; interrogative theory of meaning; problematology; problematicity of communication.

Full Text:

Full Text: PDF

References


BEL, Olivier (2000) L’éthique interrogative. Hermeneutique et problématologie de notre condition langagière. Paris: PUF.

BALAHUR, Paul (2006) Problematologie si comunicare. Iasi: Editura Perfomantica.

BALAHUR, Paul (2004) Personalitate si creatie în etica moderna. Iasi: Editura Universitatii Al.I.Cuza.

BRETON, Phillip si Serge PROULX (2002) L’explosion de la communication a l’aube du XXI siecle. Paris: Decouverte.

CAMERON, Deborah (2000) Good to Talk? Living and Working in a Communication Culture. London: Sage.

CAREY, James (1985) Communication as Culture: Essays in Media and Society. Boston: Unwin Hyman.

CARRILHO, M.M. (1990) „Problematicité, rationalité et interrogativité”, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 175 (3): 309-328.

COLLINGWOOD, Robin George (1998) O autobiografie filosofica. Bucuresti: Editura TREI. (Traducere în româneste a cartii: An Autobiography, 1939).

COLLINGWOOD, Robin George (1940) Essays on Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

CRAIG, Robert T. (1999) „Communication Theory as a Field”, Communication Theory, 9 (2): 119-161.

CRAIG, Robert T. (2001) „Communication”, în T.O. Sloane (ed), Encyclopedia of Rhetoric, pp.125-137. New York: Oxford University Press

GROSSBERG, Lawrence (1997) Bringing it All Back Home. Essays on Cultural Studies. Durhan and London: Duke University Press.

HABERMAS, Jurgen (1998) On the pragmatics of Communication. Cambridge: MIT.

HABERMAS, Jurgen (2000) Constiinta morala si actiune comunicativa. Bucuresti: Editura Substanti ALL.

HEALY, Paul (2005) Rationality, Hermeneutics and Dialogue. Toward a Viable Post-fundational Account of Rationality. Burlington : Ashgate Publishing Co.

HINTIKKA, Jaakko (1999) Inquiry as Inquiry. A Logic of Scientific Discovery. Dordrecht: Kluwer

HOGAN, John P. (2007) „Hermeneutics and the Logic of Question and Answer: Collingwood and Gadamer”, The Heytrop Journal 28 (3): 263-284.

HOYNEGEN-HUENE, Paul (2006) „Context of Discovery versus Context of Justification and Thomas Kuhn”, în J. Schckore, Fr. Steinle (eds.), Revising Discovery and Justification. Historical and Philosophical Perpectives on the Context Distinction, pp.119-131, Dordrecht: Springer.

GADAMER, Hans Georg (1960/2001) Wahrheit und Methode, 1960. (Trad. rom: Adevar si metoda, Bucuresti: Editura Teora, 2001).

GOLDEN, J.L., Jamison D.L. (1990) „Meyer’s Theory of Problèmatology”, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 175(3): 329-351.

KUHN, Thomas (1962) The structure of scientific revolution. 1962. (Trad. rom: Structura revolutiilor stiintifice (1976). Bucuresti: Editura Stiintifica).

LAKOFF, George si Mark Johnson (1980) Metaphores we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

LEMPEREUR, Alain (1990) „Le questionnement comme synthese de l’humain”, în Revue Internationale de philosophie 175 (3): 471-495.

LYOTARD, Jean Francois (1983) Le differend. Paris: Editions de Minuit.

MCQUAIL, Denis (1999 ) Comunicarea. Iasi: Editura Institutul European.

MEYER, Michel (1986) De la problématologie. Philosophie, science et langage, Bruxelles: Pierre Mardaga.

MEYER, Michel (1988) „The Interrogative Theory of Meaning and Reference”, în M. Meyer (ed) Questions and questioning, pp.121-143. Berlin/ New York: Walter de Gruyter.

MEYER, Michel (2000/2007) Questionnement et historicité. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2000; „A Preface to Questioning and Historicity”, trad. în engleza, în Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 2007, 61(4), pp. 353-356.

MINK, Louis O. (1969) Mind, History and Dialectic: The Philosophy of R.G Collingwood, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

OSBORNE, Thomas (2003) „What is a Problem?”, în History of Human Sciences, 16 (4): 1-17.

SALAVASTRU Constantin (2001) Critica rationalitatii discursive. Iasi: Editura Polirom.

SWINDAL, James (1994) „The Problem of Problematization in Discourse Ethics”, Philosophy Social Criticism, 20 (1): 1-18.

TURNBULL, Nick (2006), „How Should We Theorise Public Policy? Problem Solving and Problematicity”, Policy and Society, 25 (2): 1-20. http://www.policyandsociety.org/archive/vol25no2/PS%2025-2%20TURNBULL.pdf

TURNBULL, Nick (2007) „Problematology: a New Paradigm for Thought”, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 61 (4): 349-352.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.